{"id":2982,"date":"2011-03-06T20:00:08","date_gmt":"2011-03-07T02:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/?p=2982"},"modified":"2014-09-06T14:54:57","modified_gmt":"2014-09-06T20:54:57","slug":"in-my-backyard-year-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/?p=2982","title":{"rendered":"In My Backyard: Year 6"},"content":{"rendered":"

Surprise!<\/em> I have no head cold sob story I can share with you for the third year running to kick off our annual missive on the triumphs and near misses of C-U Blogfidential<\/strong>, the only Web site dedicated to filmmaking and movie viewing in downstate Illinois<\/strong>. I can\u2019t even draw a cheeky \u201cpain for our arts\u201d parallel from my root canal last week because A. the good doctor began but did not finish the procedure due to an unhealthy root in need of antibiotics, and B. the good doctor numbed me up quite well and I hardly felt a thing. Then again, considering what has <\/em>transpired during the past year, obliterated sensations and underlying decay might be apt analogies as anything\u2026<\/p>\n

Year 5 finished up strongly after motivation nearly bottomed out during the summer. Apparently, we can only handle so much consecutively or concurrently at the Secret MICRO-FILM Headquarters<\/strong>, for what should have been cinema nirvana<\/em> between last January and May \u2013 the first New Art Film Festival<\/strong>, the second IMC Film Festival<\/strong>, the 12th Roger Ebert\u2019s Film Festival<\/strong>, one issue of C-U Confidential<\/strong>, two issues of Bachelor Pad Magazine<\/strong><\/span> (to mix it up a bit), and general CUBlog <\/strong>upkeep \u2013 nearly sucked our energies dry. We certainly trust everybody enjoyed these efforts but for us, noble thoughts led right to extensive work that simply didn\u2019t let up until before Memorial Day<\/strong> weekend. A few weeks later, the Family Pankoke suffered a genuine blow by losing our Pappy <\/strong>to the ages<\/a>, bless his soul.<\/p>\n

I contemplated placing CUBlog <\/strong>on hiatus and posting did slow to a crawl, but one day a funny thing happened on the way to the Sesquicentennial Neighborhood<\/strong>. We recommitted our dedication to the Confidential lifestyle and picked up steam again. Old friend Tyler Tharpe<\/strong> climbed aboard as a columnist, Michelle Kaffko<\/strong> turned in a bonus \u201cKnife in a Gun Fight<\/strong>,\u201d local filmmaker Robin Christian<\/strong> contributed two articles, once-shelved department Clean Slate <\/strong>returned to coerce readers into constructive thought, and yours truly engineered our first product giveaway, yet the most cohesive step forward in Year 5 involved our comprehensive \u201cnews column\u201d C-U Biz-en-sc\u00e8ne<\/strong>. If anything <\/em>currently posted here is proof incarnate that we keep loving tabs<\/a> on Champaign-Urbana<\/strong>\u2019s film arts and stubbornly wear it on our sleeves, it\u2019s the Biz<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve also thought about shelving CUBlog <\/strong>for other reasons. At the risk of sounding overly dramatic, something <\/em>is missing from this relationship between us and you, the dearest readers, as well as you, the rest of Champaign-Urbana. I just can\u2019t place a finger upon the underlying problem and it would be too cynical and hopeless for us to believe the people who populate our immediate world don\u2019t care enough collectively about what we\u2019ve been doing for more than a decade. We open Comments <\/strong>on CUBlog <\/strong>and receive little to no interaction; we consistently issue weekly Mailing List<\/strong> reminders and have subsequently lost <\/em>subscribers; we ensure a steady flow of Facebook <\/strong>updates which are seen (per the statistics) but rarely acted upon (we don\u2019t need statistics to realize this); we run a pre-order form for the C-U Confidential \u201999<\/strong> special in last year\u2019s CUZine <\/strong>and nobody <\/em>bites. Frankly, I\u2019m fucking stumped.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a frustrating conclusion to draw because we know <\/em>this dire portrait is hardly absolute. CUBlog <\/strong>would not have 87 subscribers on the Mailing List, 273 fans on Facebook<\/a>, or 13 friends on the C-U Confidential YouTube channel<\/strong><\/a> if people found no value in our efforts. CUBlog <\/strong>also would have no CUZine <\/strong>to speak of<\/a>, let alone proudly distribute at \u201cEbertfest\u201d and other events, if not for advertisers who find it worthy as a promotional tool. We\u2019d certainly attract little interest during those festivals, public screenings, Champaign Movie Makers<\/strong> and Central Illinois Film Commission<\/strong> meetings, and the like if folks didn\u2019t trust the product we put out there. We appreciate every <\/em>single ounce of collaboration and camaraderie afforded us, but during certain hours of certain days it just doesn\u2019t seem sufficient enough for us to pursue this over the long haul, under our own power, and on our own dime \u2013 save those advertising dollars, which all go towards CUZine <\/strong>\u2013 unless we\u2019re merely doing it for ourselves.<\/p>\n

Some will argue self-satisfaction should be more than enough reward. For better or worse, we\u2019ve aimed higher since day one. We hoped (and still <\/em>hold out hope) CUBlog <\/strong>could appeal strongly to general audiences and also attract a regular stream of collaborators with enough desire or ambition to put something back into the project, given its community-specific aspects. We have a hard time gauging the former and, sadly, we\u2019ve never come close to entertaining the latter. On our worst days, acknowledging this reality while continuing to move forward is much harder than you probably can imagine.<\/p>\n

As of this writing, shall we quit and head for the hills? (We know, we know, \u201cWhat <\/em>hills?\u201d) No such luck, friends, we\u2019re not giving up the ghosts of C-U movies past and present quite yet. We see upgrade potential in CUBlog <\/strong>and we\u2019ll be constantly retooling our direction while considering alternate futures, lest this folly burns out like MICRO-FILM<\/strong> before it. So, what do we do? We\u2019re glad we asked and, since we\u2019ve publicly thrown this question out there numerous times before with nary a response from anyone else, we\u2019re even glad to answer it for ourselves.<\/p>\n

Our editorial concentration has been focused on the Biz <\/strong>lately and although we\u2019re pleased with how it has turned out, we\u2019re also highly disappointed that readers haven\u2019t been inspired enough to regularly generate conversation through it. CUBiz <\/strong>requires a sizable chunk of time to assemble, so we may downscale its breadth or cut back its frequency between June and August to make room for giving all our outlets attention. CUBlog <\/strong>is way <\/em>overdue for its overhaul involving revised copy, improved graphics, and other minor accruements. The YouTube channel will earn a \u201csister station\u201d over on Vimeo<\/strong>, while adding Twitter <\/strong>to the arsenal is not out of the question. We also believe we need to balance the CUBiz <\/strong>grind with generating other content of scope, returning long-form interviews and feature articles to the fold. The most involved spin-off projects, for which we won\u2019t provide specifics just yet, involve ventures into video content and additional print titles on top of the annual CUZine <\/strong>and the ever-lingering return of MICRO-FILM<\/strong>. As usual, watch right here for announcements and calls to action.<\/p>\n

You do <\/em>like some personal cinema with your action, don\u2019t you?<\/p>\n

~ Jason Pankoke<\/p>\n

\n

C-U Blogfidential: Year 5<\/strong><\/span>
\nPosts: 94* ~ Comments: 38 ~ Interviews: 0** ~ Articles: 3
\nColumns: 5*** ~ Reviews: 1 ~ Links: +1 ~ Publications: 1<\/p>\n

C-U Blogfidential So Far<\/strong><\/span>
\nPosts: 492 ~ Comments: 61**** ~ Interviews: 9 ~ Articles: 9
\nColumns: 5 ~ Reviews: 6 ~ Links: 369***** ~ Publications: 6<\/p>\n

\n

*Technically this means we posted a bit less than in Year 4 but note the informational and anecdotal density of most C-U Biz-en-sc\u00e8ne <\/strong>columns, which are the equivalent of three to six average-length posts in years past. You\u2019re welcome.<\/p>\n

**Technically it looks like we haven\u2019t talked to anyone for quoting purposes on CUBlog<\/strong>, but regular readers will know better; this category tallies up the long-form discussions. Regardless, the goose egg looks rather forlorn sitting up there. We\u2019re hatching a plan to introduce a new breed of Q&A du C-U<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

***We\u2019re fudging this total twofold by A. not including CUBiz <\/strong>since it functions more as a compilation than a column, and B. including all of Michelle Kaffko\u2019s \u201cA Knife in a Gun Fight\u201d entries, which stretch back before last year\u2019s \u201cBackyard<\/strong>\u201d when we weren\u2019t smart enough to debut a Columns category.<\/p>\n

****Your humble editor was happy to see this once he decided to leave the Comments <\/strong>open on most postings. Your humble editor would be much <\/em>happier if this count had reached triple digits and then some by now. CUBlog <\/strong>is trying its damndest to post editorial worth conversation up here every week; your dialogue tells us if we\u2019re keeping your interest or striking a chord and the evidence tells us we\u2019re not achieving either goal. Help us out, folks<\/em>. It only costs you a few minutes and thoughts per comment!<\/p>\n

*****Technically the near-identical number here proves we slacked on our pledge from \u201cBackyard<\/strong>\u201d Year 4 to update our blogroll and remove dead links. Whether you believe us or not, we have begun composing a fresh directory Page that will replace the side-column links. Watch for it this summer!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If Year 6 turns out to be the same as it ever was for C-U Blogfidential, will it be best for the spinning wheels to simply stop turning? This one’s up to you, dearest readers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[406,182,28,189,217,16],"tags":[1705,1702,80],"class_list":["post-2982","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-c-u-biz-en-scene","category-c-u-blogfidential","category-c-u-confidential","category-c-u-confidential-shows","category-column-du-c-u","category-jp-confidential","tag-c-u-blogfidential","tag-c-u-confidential","tag-micro-film"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2982","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2982"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2982\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2982"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2982"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.micro-film-magazine.com\/cublog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2982"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}